Legal Opinion

Barnes v. Schlein

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 17, 1984No. 11757PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiff appeals from a judgment for the defendant, rendered after the trial court concluded that the plaintiff’s medical malpractice suit was *733barred by the statute of limitations and granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. In her appeal, the plaintiff claims the court erred in granting the motion because (1) a prior motion for summary judgment had been denied, thus establishing the law of the case; (2) the court applied the wrong statute of limitations, and; (3) there existed a genuine issue of fact concerning the date when the injury was discovered.

The facts, undisputed by…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United Oil Co. v. Urban Redevelopment CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
  2. Burns v. Hartford HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  3. Breen v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  4. Yanow v. Teal Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  5. Bartha v. Waterbury House Wrecking Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Bellsouth Telecommunications, Inc. v. W.R. Grace & Co.--Conn.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  2. Catz v. RubensteinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  3. Zichichi v. Middlesex Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  4. Guilford Transportation Industries, Inc. v. WilnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Lewis v. Connecticut Gaming Policy BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API