Barnes v. Schlein
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Per curiam
The plaintiff appeals from a judgment for the defendant, rendered after the trial court concluded that the plaintiff’s medical malpractice suit was *733barred by the statute of limitations and granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. In her appeal, the plaintiff claims the court erred in granting the motion because (1) a prior motion for summary judgment had been denied, thus establishing the law of the case; (2) the court applied the wrong statute of limitations, and; (3) there existed a genuine issue of fact concerning the date when the injury was discovered.
The facts, undisputed by…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United Oil Co. v. Urban Redevelopment CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Burns v. Hartford HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Breen v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Yanow v. Teal Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Bartha v. Waterbury House Wrecking Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Bellsouth Telecommunications, Inc. v. W.R. Grace & Co.--Conn.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Catz v. RubensteinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Zichichi v. Middlesex Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Guilford Transportation Industries, Inc. v. WilnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- Lewis v. Connecticut Gaming Policy BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.