Legal Opinion

First Trust & Savings Bank v. Pruitt

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 17, 1922No. 10907PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Fraser.

These two actions [Nos. 10987 and 11007] were tried together. They are actions for specific performance.

I. The appellants resist specific performance, because they allege that the contract provides that, in case the buyers do not comply with their contracts, the initial payments shall be considered forfeited as liquidated damages. The cases were heard on demurrer to the complaint before Judge Ernest Moore, who overruled the demurrer. From these decrees the buyers, defendants, appeal.

The contracts must be considered as a whole. They…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Watt v. CombsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  2. Bannon v. KnaussCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  3. Thompson v. Exchange Building Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Skinner & Ruddock, Inc. v. London Guarantee & Accident Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
  5. Lewis v. Premium Investment Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API