Legal Opinion

Hellinger v. Eckerd Corp.

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided September 28, 1999No. 98-0075-CIVPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

MORENO, District Judge.

The Plaintiff, Hillel Hellinger, is suing the Defendant, Eckerd Corporation, for religious discrimination under Title VII for failing to hire him because he refused to sell condoms due to his religious beliefs. The Defendant argues that the Plaintiff cannot establish a prima facie case of religious discrimination because the Plaintiff did not inform the Defendant of his religious restriction or his need for accommodation. Moreover, the Defendant argues that it cannot reasonably accommodate the Plaintiff without…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Dixon v. the Hallmark Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
  2. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
  3. Mousa v. Lauda Air Luftfahrt, A.G.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2003
  4. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2011
  5. Rice v. U.S.F. Holland, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API