Rhodes v. Allen
Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, P. J.
These appeals require us to decide whether two sets of landlords, seeking to recover possession of controlled housing accommodations from their respective tenants, are, in so doing, acting “in good faith,” as that phrase is used in the federal rent control statutes.
The case of Janise v. Bryan arises under the Housing and Bent Act of 1947 (Public Law 388, 79th Congress, 61 Stats. 193), which provides, in section 209(a) (2) (50 U.S.C.A. App. p. 505, § 1899(a) (2)), that no landlord may maintain an ac*938tion or proceeding to oust a rent paying tenant from controlled housing accommodations as to…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- County of Los Angeles v. FrisbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- McDonald v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Estate of RuleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- McCluskey v. WareCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Whitley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.