Everson v. Haun
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMcBRIDE, C. J.
The weight of testimony seems to support the defendants’ contention. The original contract was made between Alexander C. Everson and James F. Haun. The premises to be conveyed were in fact held in entirety by Alexander Everson and his wife, Canzada, but the testimony indicated that before the final consummation of the contract she was fully aware of its terms and consented thereto on condition that she and her husband should be permitted to occupy one of the houses called the “home place” for six months at a reduced rental, and that when this was conceded she took an active part in making an…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Powell v. SheetsOregon Supreme Court · 1952
- Union Central Life Ins. Co. v. KerronOregon Supreme Court · 1928
- Ruby v. West Coast Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1932
- Templeton v. HollinsheadOregon Supreme Court · 1926
- Eagle Industries, Inc. v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.