Legal Opinion

Haskell v. Patterson

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 23, 1924PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.

The plaintiffs below, appellees here, as trustees of the Arkansas Development- Syndicate (hereafter called syndicate), instituted this action in the chancery -court of Columbia County, Arkansas, against the defendants below, appellants here, to have an alleged fraudulent conveyance set aside and a trust declared in an undivided interest in oil and gas leases of land in Columbia and Nevada counties, Arkansas, which leases were taken in the name of M. G-. Haskell, and the lands are described in the complaint.

The plaintiffs alleged that M. G-. Haskell and O. M. Evans were first named as trustees…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. White v. ShermanIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Pomeroy v. BentonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
  3. Bray v. TimmsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
  4. Betts v. HackathornSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
  5. Endicott v. MarvelNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Oil Fields Corporation v. DashkoSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  2. Lewis v. BushSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
  3. Schlumpf v. ShofnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
  4. Wofford v. JacksonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
  5. Johnson v. BellmontSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API