Legal Opinion

Betts v. Hackathorn

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 25, 1923PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHumphreys, J.

Appellee instituted suit against appellant in the circuit court, of Hempstead County to recover $180 for goods sold and delivered to the Hope Oil Trust, a concern doing business under a written declaration commonly known as the “Massachusetts trust.” The suit is based upon an allegation that the Hope Oil Trust is a partnership, and that appellants are members thereof, and as such are individually liable for the indebtedness of the .concern. The six appellants first named were denominated trustees in the declaration. They filed a separate answer, admitting the amount of the account and that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Davis' AdministratrixSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Mayo v. MoritzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
  3. Baker-McGrew Co. v. Union Seed & Fertilizer Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
  4. Mehaffy v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
  5. Wilson v. TodhunterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Schumann-Heink v. FolsomIllinois Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Goldwater v. OltmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Darling v. BuddySupreme Court of Missouri · 1927
  4. Hemphill v. OrloffMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Hayden Plan Co. v. WoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API