Legal Opinion

Howard v. Illinois Central Railroad

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 18, 1914PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Fulton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

*784Opinion op the Court by

Judge Carroll

— Reversing.

The appellants, Howard and Callahan, shipped from Coulterville, Illinois, to Fulton, Kentucky, a carload of mules. These mules, in course of shipment, and at Mounds, Illinois, were left standing in open pens in a cold rain for several hours, and, by reason of the exposure, a number of them were seriously injured and damaged.

To recover compensation for the loss sustained by the injuries to the stock so occurring, they brought this suit.

For answer to the petition, the railroad company, after denying negligence in the carriage of the stock, set up…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. HarrimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Hudson & Co. v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1894
  4. Hinkle v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
  5. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Metz Co. v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  2. Adams Express Co. v. CookCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  3. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. LeachCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  4. The Henry S. GroveDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1923
  5. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API