The Henry S. Grove
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion of the CourtNeterer, District Judge
(after stating the'facts as above). The stipulations in a bill of lading limiting the time within which to present claim for loss or damage and within which to bring an action, if reasonable, is binding. The Queen of the Pacific, 180 U. S. 49, 21 Sup. Ct. 278, 45 L. Ed. 419; Southern Exp. Co. v. Caldwell, 21 Wall. 264, 22 L. Ed. 556; Mo., Kan. & Tex. Ry. Co. v. Harriman, 227 U. S. 672, 33 Sup. Ct. 397, 57 L. Ed. 690; Gooch v. Ore. S. D. Ry. Co., 258 U. S. 22, 42 Sup. Ct. 192, 66 L. Ed. 443. It is apparent, from the rec*504ord that the libelant and claimant sought to adjust the controversy,,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. HarrimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Express Co. v. CaldwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- American Railway Express Co. v. LindenburgSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Queen of the PacificSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Gooch v. Oregon Short Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- West India Industries, Inc. v. Tradex, Tradex Petroleum ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Louda v. Prague Assurance-National Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1952
- The GeorgianDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1933
- Muir v. American Diamond Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1935
- Chase Bag Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.