Legal Opinion
Nemec v. United States Dawson v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 16, 1950No. 11975, 12012PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POPE, Circuit Judge.
By an indictment found against them, Nemec and Dawson were charged with devising a scheme to defraud investors in contracts and profit sharing agreements relating to the location and operation of mining claims. The indictment listed 19 sepa- . rate alleged false and fraudulent pretenses, representations and promises. Fifteen overt acts were alleged to have been committed in carrying out the scheme.
Count 1 charged that the defendants conspired to violate the Act relating to the use of the mails to defraud, 1 and the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. 2 Count 2 charged…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rudd v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
- Blue v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
- Langford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- Cain v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
- Marshall v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- United States v. S. Lawrence Kahn, Arthur B. Sachs and M. Prial CurranCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1967
- Meyer Harris Cohen, AKA Michael 'Mickey' Cohen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- People v. VarnumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Helen A. Davenport v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
- United States v. Milton R. AronsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.