Chicago, Pekin & Southwestern Railroad v. President & Trustees
Illinois Supreme Court
1Per curiam
On considering the petition heretofore filed, we granted a rehearing to further consider the question, whether the railroad company had the power to contract for and purchase shares of stock of its own company. We have again fully examined the question, and, after considering the arguments and authorities bearing on the question, we will proceed to announce our conclusions thus reached.
The rule is familiar, and is not contested, that such bodies can only exercise such powers as may be conferred by the legislative body creating them, either in express terms or by necessary implication; and the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- The City Bank of Columbus v. . Bruce and FoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Melvin v. Lamar InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
- Ex parte HolmesNew York Supreme Court · 1826
3Cited by11 opinions
- People ex rel. Peabody v. Chicago Gas Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1889
- Clapp v. PetersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
- Porter v. Plymouth Gold Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1904
- Mannington v. Hocking Valley Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1910
- Fremont Carriage Manufacturing Co. v. ThomsenNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.