Ridenour v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
RATLIFF, Senior Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
James Ridenour appeals from his conviection of child molesting and battery.
We affirm.
ISSUES
I. Did Ridenour have a constitutional right to have an attorney present at his initial hearing?
II. Was Ridenour denied a fair trial because the jury overheard conversations between Ridenour and his trial counsel?
III. Was Ridenour denied a fair trial because the trial judge failed to question members of the jury regarding possible conversations with a juror who was excused during the pen-dency of the trial?
IV. Did the trial court err by admitting into evidence…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited46 opinions
- United States v. OwensSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. Anthony Provenzano, Stephen Andretta, and Thomas AndrettaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Bruce v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
- United States v. Andrew West, Vertis King, and Garland JeffersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Lindsey v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Mitchem v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
- Battles v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
- Singer v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- Goodner v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
- Allen v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.