Legal Opinion

Patricia J. Hanley and Judy Hanley v. Four Corners Vacation Properties, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 27, 1973No. 72-1652PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PICKETT, Circuit Judge.

The Hanleys seek relief from a state court judgment foreclosing their rights to real property, which judgment they claim is void under the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the federal Constitution. The basis for the claim is that the Hanleys were not served in a mechanic’s lien foreclosure action through which the appellee’s predecessor in interest obtained title. One of the defenses to the complaint filed herein was that the due process issue was fully litigated in a subsequent suit to quiet title culminating in a judgment disallowing the Hanley claim…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. American Surety Co. v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re Martha S. Griego, Debtor. Martha S. Griego v. Raymond E. PadillaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  2. Johnson v. SpencerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
  3. Donald E. Spence v. Patience LattingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
  4. Marie Anne Brown v. Leonard J. Delayo, Individually and as Superintendent of Public InstructionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
  5. National Labor Relations Board v. Gordon (In Re Gordon)District Court, D. Colorado · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API