Legal Opinion
Coalition for Adequate Review v. City & County of San Francisco
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 15, 2014No. A135512PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BANKE, J,
I. Introduction
The City and County of San Francisco (City) prevailed in this California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA; Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.) 1 writ proceeding brought by the Coalition for Adequate Review and Alliance for Comprehensive Planning (collectively, petitioners). After securing judgment, the City filed a memorandum of costs totaling $64,144, largely for costs incurred in preparing a supplemental record of the proceedings. Petitioners filed a motion to tax. The trial court granted the motion and denied all costs. The court’s reasoning was twofold:…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Ladas v. California State Automobile Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Gorman v. Tassajara Development Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- Neighbors for Smart Rail v. Exposition Metro Line Construction AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- California Oak Foundation v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Eureka Citizens for Responsible Government v. City of EurekaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Landwatch San Luis Obispo Cnty. v. Cambria Cmty. Servs. Dist., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- LandWatch San Luis Obispo Co. v. Cambria Comm. Serv. Dist.California Court of Appeal · 2018
- North County Advocates v. City of CarlsbadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Rozanova v. UribeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
- Yolo Land and Water Defense v. County of YoloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024