Legal Opinion

Rozanova v. Uribe

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 30, 2021No. H047985Published

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 8/30/21 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT NADEJDA L. ROZANOVA, H047985 (Monterey County Plaintiff and Appellant, Super. Ct. No. 19CV001593) v. RAFAEL URIBE et al., Defendants and Respondents. Appellant Nadejda Rozanova appeals from a postjudgment order on a motion to tax costs. Rozanova contends the trial court erred by refusing to tax costs for items she claims are neither expressly authorized by statute nor allowable under the statute’s discretionary provisions. (See Code of Civ. Proc., § 1033.5, subds. (a), (c)(2),…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Wilson v. Parker, Covert & ChidesterCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Jennings v. MarralleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Jameson v. DestaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Benach v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API