Legal Opinion

Kinney v. Yerusalim

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 2, 1993No. Civ. A. 92-4101PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

BARTLE, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, disabled individuals who reside and work in Philadelphia, have filed this class action against Howard Yerusalim, Secretary of the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT), and Alexander Hoskins, Commissioner of the Streets Department of the City of Philadelphia (“City”), under the Americans With Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. 1 Plaintiffs seek to compel the City to install “curb ramps” or “other sloped areas” on all streets which the City has resurfaced since January 26, 1992, the effective date of the ADA. Before…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Tcherepnin v. KnightSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Disabled in Action of Pennsylvania v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  2. Parr v. L & L Drive-Inn RestaurantDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2000
  3. Kornblau v. Dade CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
  4. Tyler v. City of ManhattanDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1994
  5. Niece v. FitznerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1996

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API