Legal Opinion
Loshonkohl v. Kinder
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 6, 2003No. D039267PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
The issue presented in this case is whether Civil Code section 47.5 (undesignated section references are to this code) is unconstitutional under the First Amendment as improper content-based discrimination. We answer this question in the negative and affirm.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Appellant failed to designate a reporter's transcript of the trial; thus, our factual summary derives from the trial court's statement of decision.
Dona Loshonkohl, a veteran…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- R. A. v. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Garrison v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Boos v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hagberg v. California Federal Bank FSBCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Levin v. United Air Lines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Silas v. ArdenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- STAMAS v. County of MaderaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2011
- Urs Corp. v. Venture, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.