Legal Opinion
STAMAS v. County of Madera
District Court, E.D. California
Decided June 14, 2011No. Case CV F 09-0753 LJO SMSPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE SUMMARY ADJUDICATION (Doc. 125,133,134)
LAWRENCE J. O’NEILL, District Judge.
Three motions for summary judgment, or in the alternative, summary adjudication pursuant to Rule 56 are pending before this Court: (1) Defendants Linda Barlow’s and Gerald Houston’s motion against plaintiffs Mark Stamas and Judy Castles, (2) Defendant County of Madera’s and the Board of Supervisors’ motion against plaintiffs Mark Stamas and Judy Castles, and (3) Plaintiff Mark Stamas’ and Judy Castles’ motion to adjudicate material facts and conclusions of law.
2Cases cited76 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Cedano v. Aurora Loan Services, LLC (In Re Cedano)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Hardesty v. Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2013
- (PS) Matthews v. Caliber Home LoansDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- California State Grange v. Carolina Casualty Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2022
- Crescent Associates LLC v. DrorUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 2021
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.