Legal Opinion

Gasperson v. Madill National Bank

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 8, 1970No. 17107PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BREWSTER, Justice.

This appeal is from a judgment in a non-jury trial. The trial court consolidated for trial three separate cases pending on its docket and ordered the parties to replead. This resulted in the Madill National Bank of Madill, Oklahoma, as plaintiff, suing E. G. Gasperson for $7,791.73 which it claimed was the balance of principal, interest and attorney fees due and owing to such bank on a renewal note that E. G. Gasperson executed, payable to that bank.

E. G. Gasperson and his brother, Adrian Gasperson, and one James E. (Jim) Gasper-son, filed and went to trial on what…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. McKenzie v. CarteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  2. Alexander Schroeder Lumber Co. v. CoronaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  3. Fort Worth National Bank v. Red River National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Murray v. MurrayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
  5. Kinney v. ShugartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Fort Worth Independent School District v. City of Fort WorthTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Stahl Petroleum Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Gerdes v. Mustang Exploration Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1984
  4. F. R. Hernandez Construction & Supply Co. v. National Bank of Commerce of BrownsvilleTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Pine v. Gibraltar Savings AssociationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API