Legal Opinion

City of Neenah v. Krueger

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1932PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.

The defendant was found guilty of violation of sec. 2 of ordinance 341, vol. 3. Secs. 1 and 2 are printed in the margin.1

The case was tried before the court without a jury. After the evidence was all in and the court had the matter under advisement, it held that “sec. 1 of the ordinance deals with a class of acts tending to a considerable obstruction or incumbrance of the streets but having a claim to be permitted by reason of some degree of general necessity, to determine which the ordinance requires a permit from the board of public works, which when given may in proper cases prescribe the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mason v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Boardman v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Darnall v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
  2. State v. PetersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Stefan Auto Body v. State Highway CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Troiano v. Colorado Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
  5. Sprecher v. Weston's Bar, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1977

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API