Endangered Habitats League, Inc. v. State Water Res. Control Bd.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MORRISON, J.
The trial court sustained a California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) challenge. (Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.; further section references are to this code). The dispute in this case is about where to begin. Real parties in interest focus on defenses of statute of limitations and exhaustion of remedies. Plaintiffs defend the trial court’s focus on “tiering” and conclude the challenge lodged in this case was proper because there had been no prior opportunity to challenge this “tier” of the project. We shall modify the judgment and affirm.
Procedural Background
The…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
- County of Inyo v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Sierra Club v. County of SonomaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Concerned Citizens of Costa Mesa, Inc. v. 32nd District Agricultural Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Federation of Hillside & Canyon Associations v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- County of Amador v. El Dorado County Water AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Stockton Citizens for Sensible Planning v. City of StocktonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Hines v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Ballona Wetlands Land Trust v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.