Legal Opinion

Tucker v. City of Montgomery Board of Commissioners

District Court, M.D. Alabama

Decided March 16, 1976No. Civ. A. 74-221-NPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before GODBOLD, Circuit Judge, and JOHNSON and VARNER, District Judges. GODBOLD, Circuit Judge:

This class action concerns the constitutionality of several practices claimed to prevail in the Municipal Court of Montgomery, Alabama, and the constitutionality of Alabama statutes that relate to those practices.

These are the alleged practices in question: (1) requiring a convicted defendant to furnish a surety bond in order to appeal his conviction; (2) payment of fees to the Presiding Judge of the Municipal Court in various cases where he has found the defendant guilty or has bound him…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Rizzo v. GoodeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Santiago v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. In re the Gap Stores Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1978
  3. Thillens, Inc. v. Community Currency Exchange Ass'n of Illinois, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983
  4. Life of the Land v. BurnsHawaii Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Cronin v. Town of AmesburyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1995

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API