Legal Opinion
Cronin v. Town of Amesbury
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided July 25, 1995No. Civ. A. 93-11890-PBSPublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
SARIS, District Judge.
Plaintiff Michael A. Cronin (“Cronin”) alleges that the Town of Amesbury Board of Selectmen, the Town Manager, and certain podce officers conspired to terminate him from his position as the town’s podce chief, in violation of his right to procedural due process under the Fourteenth Amendment. The Town Manager terminated Cronin on the ground that he lied when he denied under oath writing a pornographic letter. Cronin asserts violations of 42 U.S.C. § 1983, § 1985(3) and state law, 1 and seeks…
2Cases cited71 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Cronin v. Town of AmesburyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Schubert v. City of RyeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Botsko v. Davenport Civil Rights CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 2009
- Prestopnik v. WhelanDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2003
- Piscottano v. Town of SomersDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.