Legal Opinion
United Technologies Corp. v. United States Department of Defense
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided March 23, 2010No. 08-5435, 08-5436PublishedCited by 163 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge HENDERSON.
KAREN LeCRAFT HENDERSON, Circuit Judge.
Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation (Sikorsky) and the Pratt and Whitney Division (Pratt) of United Technologies Corporation appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the Department of Defense (Defense or DoD) and the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) 1 in Sikorsky’s and Pratt’s separate lawsuits to prevent the release of certain DCMA documents evaluating their respective quality control processes. Sikorsky and Pratt contend that DCMA’s decision to release the documents was arbitrary…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Federal Bureau of Investigation v. AbramsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Critical Mass Energy Project v. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
- National Parks and Conservation Association v. Rogers C. B. Morton, Secretary, Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by163 opinions
- National Security Counselors v. Central Intelligence AgencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- National Security Counselors v. Central Intelligence AgencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Bigwood v. United States Department of DefenseDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Hardy v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and ExplosivesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Department of the TreasuryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
158 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.