Legal Opinion
Barrows v. Kenosha County
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided October 6, 1959PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.
The position of the defendant county on this appeal is that the evidence adduced did not rebut the statutory presumption provided in sec. 80.01 (2), Stats., that Wood road was a four-rod road at the time the 1954 improvement of such highway was undertaken. The plaintiffs contend that it did.
The material portions of sec. 80.01 (2), Stats., read as follows:
“Unrecorded highways validated, exception; GRANTS FOR HIGHWAY PURPOSES, PRESUMPTIVE WIDTH. All highways not recorded which have been worked as public highways ten years or more are public highways, and are presumed to be four rods wide,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Nicolai v. DavisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
- Dickinson v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
- State ex rel. Jarman v. RootWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
3Cited by6 opinions
- Harley-Davidson Motor Company, Incorporated v. Powersports, Incorporated and Powersports of Seminole County, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Threlfall v. Town of MuscodaCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994
- Bolger v. Merrill Lynch Ready Assets TrustCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1988
- Affeldt v. Green Lake CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011
- Opinion No. Oag 20-80, (1980), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.