Threlfall v. Town of Muscoda
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtGartzke, P.J.
The plaintiffs, Anna Threlfall and Richard Baum, appeal from a judgment in favor of the Town of Muscoda (1) declaring that Sand Branch Road is four rods (sixty-six feet) wide where it crosses their property and that the Town's cutting trees and shrubs along the road has not damaged them, and (2) awarding costs to the Town.
The plaintiffs contend that the trial court erred (1) in applying the presumption in § 80.01(2), STATS., 1 that an unrecorded highway that has been worked as a public highway ten years or more is a public highway presumed to be four rods wide, (2) in holding that the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Reiman Associates, Inc. v. R/A Advertising, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981
- Heninger v. DunnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Gilman v. BrownWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
- Otto v. CornellCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
- Nicolai v. Wisconsin Power & Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Weitz v. GreenIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
- Vaught v. A.O. Hardee & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
- George E. Morabit v. Dennis HoagSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2013
- Klingshirn v. McNealCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- Gallagher v. Grant-Lafayette Electric CooperativeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.