Legal Opinion

State v. Vogel

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 22, 1996No. 95-840PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Michael Vogel appeals, arguing that his conviction for operating while intoxicated (OWI), third offense, following the administrative revocation of his driver’s license for refusing to submit to chemical testing violates the Double Jeopardy Clause’s prohibition against multiple punishments. We affirm.

I. Scope of Review.

Because Vogel raises a constitutional claim, this court’s review is de novo. State v. Funke, 531 N.W.2d 124, 126 (Iowa 1995).

II. Factual Background.

Police went to Vogel’s residence in response to a domestic abuse call. There, officers detected the smell of alcoholic beverages…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Dixon v. LoveSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Gottschalk v. SueppelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Toby Joseph Welch v. Iowa Department of Transportation, Motor Vehicle DivisionSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
  2. State of Iowa v. Iowa District Court for Scott CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
  3. Teresa Karen Bearinger v. Iowa Department of Transportation, Motor Vehicle DivisionSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
  4. Schilling v. Iowa Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Iowa · 2002
  5. State v. KrebsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API