Legal Opinion

State v. Otte

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1996No. 94-2622PublishedCited by 164 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCook, J.

We have reviewed Otte’s seven propositions of law, independently weighed the aggravating circumstances against the mitigating factors and evaluated the proportionality and appropriateness of the death penalty. For the following reasons, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals and uphold the convictions and death sentence.

Proposition of Law One — Car Search

In his first proposition of law, Otte contends that the trial court should have suppressed the evidence (guns, ammunition, pillow with red stain, and checkbook) found in the police search of the 1962 Impala. Otte lacks standing to…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court · 1989

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by164 opinions

  1. State v. TreeshOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. LeonardOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. CampbellOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. TibbettsOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State v. PerezOhio Supreme Court · 2009

159 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API