Legal Opinion
John Lesesne v. John Doe
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided April 9, 2013No. 11-7120PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court by Circuit Judge ROGERS.
ROGERS, Circuit Judge.
When John Lesesne filed a complaint against the District of Columbia and others regarding the pretrial conditions of his confinement he was no longer confined. Under the plain terms of the Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”), 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a), he therefore was no longer required to exhaust administrative remedies before filing suit. The District agrees that the PLRA exhaustion requirement did not apply to Lesesne but urges the court nonetheless to affirm the grant of summary judgment on his federal claims for failure to…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hormel v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States National Bank v. Independent Insurance Agents of America, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Louis A. Carducci v. Donald T. Regan, Secretary, U.S. Treasury DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 2017
- Shabtai Shatsky v. Palestine Liberation OrganizationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2020
- United States ex rel. Davis v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- Arkansas Public Employees Retirement System v. Harman International Industries Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- Liff v. Office of Inspector General for U.S. Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.