Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Marion Cummings, Bankrupt. In the Matter of Audrey Alberta Cummings, Bankrupt. In the Matter of Benancio Ernest Dominguez, Bankrupt. In the Matter of Cora Esther Dominguez, Bankrupt. Sears, Roebuck and Company and Montgomery Ward and Company

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 12, 1969No. 235-68_1PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

413 F.2d 1281

In the Matter of Marion CUMMINGS, Bankrupt.

In the Matter of Audrey Alberta CUMMINGS, Bankrupt.

In the Matter of Benancio Ernest DOMINGUEZ, Bankrupt.

In the Matter of Cora Esther DOMINGUEZ, Bankrupt.

Sears, Roebuck and Company and Montgomery Ward and Company,

Appellants.

No. 235-68.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

Aug. 12, 1969.

Herbert W. DeLaney, Jr., Denver, Colo., filed a brief for appellants Sears, Roebuck & Co. and Montgomery Ward & Co.

James R. Horton, Denver, Colo., filed a brief for himself and for William R. Young as Trustees in Bankruptcy.

Before BREITENSTEIN, HILL…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Snyder v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Lockwood v. Exchange BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Prudence Securities Advisory GroupSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Elizabeth Margaret Dallison and Max Dallison v. Sears, Roebuck and Co., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
  5. State of California, Department of Employment v. Fred S. Renauld & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. W. T. Peckham, Administrator of the Estate of Golidie W. Swinney v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, an Insurance Corporation, and Edith SwinneyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API