Legal Opinion

W. T. Peckham, Administrator of the Estate of Golidie W. Swinney v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, an Insurance Corporation, and Edith Swinney

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided September 10, 1969No. 183-68_1PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURRAH, Chief Judge.

In this Kansas diversity ease, the plaintiff-appellee, Goldie W. Swinney, 1 seeks the proceeds of a group insurance policy. The policy was issued by Metropolitan Life Insurance Company for the benefit of employees of Socony-Mo-bil Oil Company, Inc. The deceased, William J. Swinney, was employed by Mobil at the time of his death and admittedly covered by the group policy.

The real dispute is between Goldie Swinney (the first wife) and Edith Swinney (the second wife). Goldie Swinney was married to the deceased for a number of years and designated as beneficiary under the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Jamaica Time Petroleum, Inc. v. Federal Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
  2. Margery Fisher Candler and William Wallace Candler v. Louise C. Donaldson and the Mutual Benefit Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1959
  3. Goodrich v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1951
  4. Cadore v. CadoreSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
  5. Douglas-Guardian Warehouse Corporation v. George W. Jones and Bess A. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Torchia on Behalf of Torchia v. TorchiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Travelers Insurance Company v. LewisUtah Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Lonergan v. StromCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  4. Roxy v. RoxyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  5. Travelers Insurance Company v. LewisUtah Supreme Court · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API