United States v. Coleman
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COLE, Circuit Judge.
Defendant-Appellant Jimmy Coleman entered a conditional guilty plea to traveling in interstate commerce and failing to register as a sex offender under the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (“SORNA” or “the statute”), 18 U.S.C. § 2250. He reserved the right to challenge the constitutionality of the statute. On appeal, Coleman contends that SORNA, as applied to him, violates the Ex Post Facto Clause and that it constitutes an invalid exercise of Congress’s powers under the Commerce Clause. We disagree and AFFIRM.
I. BACKGROUND
On October 30, 2002, Jimmy…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Carr v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- United States v. ParksCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Jeffrey StockCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. JenkinsDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2012
- United States v. James Hill, IIICourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. HuffCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.