Legal Opinion

People v. Huston

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 27, 1941No. Crim. 3450PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

Defendant was convicted after trial by jury of violating section 288 of the Penal Code. This appeal is from the judgment and order denying his motion for a new trial.

The evidence being viewed most favorably to the people (respondent), the essential facts are:

In the spring of 1940 defendant on two separate occasions committed an act prohibited by section 288 of the Penal Code, to wit: He kissed the private parts of the prosecuting witness, a female of almost twelve years of age.

Defendant took the witness stand and specifically denied having committed any of the acts charged against him.

Defendan…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. AsavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  2. People v. RogersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. People v. KelleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. People v. HustonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. People v. WestekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. People v. CovertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. People v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API