Buhr v. Arkansas State Board of Chiropractic Examiners
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Frank Holt, Justice.
In a hearing before the Arkansas State Board of Chiropractic Examiners, appellant was found guilty of violating Ark. Stat. Ann. § 72-441 (a) (2), (6) and (8) (Supp. 1975), and his license to practice was suspended for a period of six months. The circuit court affirmed. For reversal appellant asserts that “Arkansas Statute Annotated § 72-419, setting forth the qualifications of the members of the Arkansas State Board of Chiropractic Examiners, is unconstitutional as it creates a Board which does not fairly represent the profession of chiropractics and suspension of a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State Medical Board v. RodgersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
- Aiton v. Board of Medical ExaminersArizona Supreme Court · 1911
- State Medical Board of Arkansas Medical Society v. McCrarySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
- Brown v. HassigSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
3Cited by6 opinions
- Chastek v. AndersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
- Vance v. FordhamUtah Supreme Court · 1983
- Arkansas Hearing Instrument Dispenser Board v. VanceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
- Poor v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.