Legal Opinion

Buhr v. Arkansas State Board of Chiropractic Examiners

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 21, 1977No. 76-352PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank Holt, Justice.

In a hearing before the Arkansas State Board of Chiropractic Examiners, appellant was found guilty of violating Ark. Stat. Ann. § 72-441 (a) (2), (6) and (8) (Supp. 1975), and his license to practice was suspended for a period of six months. The circuit court affirmed. For reversal appellant asserts that “Arkansas Statute Annotated § 72-419, setting forth the qualifications of the members of the Arkansas State Board of Chiropractic Examiners, is unconstitutional as it creates a Board which does not fairly represent the profession of chiropractics and suspension of a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Medical Board v. RodgersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
  2. Aiton v. Board of Medical ExaminersArizona Supreme Court · 1911
  3. State Medical Board of Arkansas Medical Society v. McCrarySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  4. Brown v. HassigSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Chastek v. AndersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Vance v. FordhamUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Arkansas Hearing Instrument Dispenser Board v. VanceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  4. Poor v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API