Legal Opinion
Ingels v. Saldana
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 11, 2007No. AC 27636PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HARPER, J.
The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether the trial court properly found the defendant Murray Real Estate Services, Inc., 1 to be liable for the conduct of its president in connection with a lease to which the defendant was a third party. After trial, the court rendered judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, Darin Ingels and Michelle Ingels, on two counts of their four count amended complaint. On appeal, the defendant challenges the judgment on both of those counts, as well as the court’s award of attorney’s fees to the plaintiffs. The defendant also claims that the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Melia v. Hartford Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Barbato v. J. & M. Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Green Rock Ridge, Inc. v. KobernatSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Presidential Capital Corp. v. RealeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Housing Authority v. OlesenConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Stuart v. StuartConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Solano v. CalegariConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- Reichenbach v. Kraska Enterprises, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- Dennis v. Hall (In re Hall)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 2012
- Dickman v. Office of State Ethics, Citizen's Ethics Advisory BoardConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.