Ganahl v. Weir
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order denying a new trial. .Walter Van Djdce, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.
The plaintiff, a materialman, is seeking a lien upon the property of defendant Nancy A. Weir. The material was furnished to defendant Fellows, a contractor, who erected a building for said Weir. The contract between the owner and contractor was a valid contract, and the contract price was nineteen hundred dollars. Defendant Weir made the two last payments demanded by the terms of the contract before they were due, and plaintiff now insists that for this reason they should be deemed as never having been made, and that the amounts thereof should he applied to the payment of his claim. This…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Simpson v. BergmannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Burnett v. GlasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Diamond Match Co. v. SilbersteinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- United Materials Co. v. LougheryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- McGaffick v. LeiglandMontana Supreme Court · 1956
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.