Legal Opinion

United Materials Co. v. Loughery

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 26, 1913No. Civ. No. 1063PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.

Action to enforce a materialman’s lien upon the buildings and land of defendant Wilder and for a deficiency judgment against the defendant Standberry.

It is alleged in the complaint that defendant Wilder is the owner of the premises described therein; that, on October 3, 1908, defendant Loughery entered into a contract with said Wilder to erect on said real estate two one-story cottages for which said Wilder agreed to pay said Loughery the sum of four thousand two hundred and fifty dollars; that said Loughery entered into a contract with defendant Standberry to furnish all the material and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kezartee v. Marks & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Hampton v. ChristensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Reed v. NortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Barrett-Hicks Co. v. GlasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
  5. Sweeney v. MeyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. L. W. Blinn Lumber Co. v. Pioneer Drainage DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  2. Citibank, N.A. v. MitchellDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024
  3. Estate of Xander Mann v. County of StanislausDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API