Legal Opinion

Occidental Real Estate Co. v. Gantner & Mattern

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 18, 1908No. Civ. No. 443PublishedCited by 9 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, setting aside a verdict on its own motion. Frank J. Murasky, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.

This is an action for unlawful detainer, brought ■ against defendant Morris Levy after default in the payment of rent and three days’ notice in writing demanding its payment and possession of the premises, under subdivision 2 of section 1161, Code of Civil Procedure. Gantner & Mattern (a corporation) was made defendant because in possession of a. portion of the premises as a subtenant of defendant Levy.

The jury rendered a verdict in favor of defendant and against plaintiff, which the court at once upon its own motion vacated, and granted a new trial, and from this order-defendant Levy has…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Townley v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Eades v. TrowbridgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Miller v. WadeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. In re YoakamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Anglo-Nevada Assurance Corp. v. RossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Webb v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  2. Bawa v. TerhuneCalifornia Superior Court · 2019
  3. Kruger v. ReyesAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 2014
  4. Mountain States Implement Co. v. AraveIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Crowder v. LackeyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1946

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API