Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Foulger

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1928No. 4572PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HANSEN, J.. The defendants prosecute this appeal from a judgment rendered in a mortgage foreclosure proceeding. The facts forming the basis of the decree of foreclosure are not in dispute. On January 17, 1922, the plaintiff and the defendants Albert B. and Herbert B. Foulger entered into a written contract whereby the plaintiff agreed to sell and Albert B. and Herbert B. Foulger agreed to buy 249% shares of stock in Last & Thomas, a corporation, for the sum of $35,000. The defendants Rachel E. Foulger and Isabel Foulger were not parties to the agreement, but were made parties to the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cooley v. CallUtah Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Harrison v. BealsOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Pacific Hardware & Steel Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1914
  4. Rose v. GarnUtah Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Wood v. City of Ocean CityNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Perkins v. SpencerUtah Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Robbins v. FinlayUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  3. United States Freight Company and Subsidiaries v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
  4. State v. One (1) Porsche 2-Door, I.D. No. 911211026, Title No. PP10026F Bearing Kansas License Plate No. JOR 1652Utah Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Bramwell Inv. Co. v. Uggla Et Ux.Utah Supreme Court · 1932

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API