Legal Opinion

Dunnebacke v. Williams

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 4, 1964PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holmes

The plaintiff in error, William Dunnebacke, instituted an action for slander against the defendant in error, Webb Williams. Two amendments to the declaration were filed and later, by order of the Court, the plaintiff in error was allowed to withdraw the original declaration and amendments and file a substitute declaration. There was a demurrer to this declaration which was sustained in the Trial Court. An appeal from this action of the Trial Court has been duly perfected.

The averments of the declaration insofar as material to the questions raised by the plaintiff in error in this Court are:

*583“*…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fry v. McCord Bros.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1895
  2. In Re Eppinger EstateTennessee Supreme Court · 1960
  3. In re Estate of EppingerTennessee Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Smith v. FieldenTennessee Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Cheatham v. PattersonTennessee Supreme Court · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Brown v. KittermanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API