Legal Opinion

In re Estate of Eppinger

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1960PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Swepston

This matter comes to us on direct appeal from the County Court of Madison County by petitioners who complain of the action of the County Court in sustaining a demurrer to their petition for attorneys’ fees.

From the following discussion the ultimate and sole question emerges as to whether an attorney’s fee will be allowed to attorneys employed only by the unsuccessful contestants of a will, even though the ordinary costs *55sometimes designated as “party to party” costs, as distinguished from extraordinary costs sometimes designated as “costs between solicitor and client” (Gillespie v. Federal…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Davis v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1943
  2. Gillespie v. Federal Compress & Warehouse Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1953
  3. Vanderbilt University v. MitchellTennessee Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Gilpin v. BurrageTennessee Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Podesta v. PodestaCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1945

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Oman Construction Co. v. Tennessee Central, Railway Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Southall v. BillingsTennessee Supreme Court · 1963
  3. In Re Eppinger EstateTennessee Supreme Court · 1960
  4. First American National Bank v. CharltonTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Kelly v. LongmireTennessee Supreme Court · 1969

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API