Legal Opinion

Smith v. Fielden

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1959PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Swepston

delivered tlie opinion of the Court.

Edward B. Smith, hereinafter called plaintiff, sued Carl R. Fielden, hereinafter called defendant, for damages in an action of slander. The declaration was dismissed on demurrer and hence the appeal directly to this Court.

The declaration as amended contains the following two paragraphs:

“1. The plaintiff sues the defendant for Fifteen Thousand ($15,000) as damages for falsely and maliciously charging the plaintiff with drunkenness and with driving an automobile while under the influence of an intoxicant, by speaking of and concerning him in the presence of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fry v. McCord Bros.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Bank v. Bowdre Bros.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Torres v. HunerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
  4. Inman v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1953

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Venn v. Tennessean Newspapers, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1962
  2. Electric Furnace Corporation, Cross-Plaintiff-Appellee v. Deering Milliken Research Corporation, Cross-Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963
  3. Newby v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Dunnebacke v. WilliamsTennessee Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Aegis Sciences Corporation v. Lou Ann Zelenik - DissentCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API