Legal Opinion

Farver v. Department of Retirement Systems

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 27, 1981No. 4836-IIPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReed, C.J.

Plaintiff Jill Berling Farver appeals from an order granting summary judgment in favor of defendants John and Betty Berling. The principal issue presented on appeal is whether a wife's interest in her husband's state pension 1 is inheritable. We hold it is and, accordingly, reverse the trial court's order.

Phyllis and John Berling were married in 1944. In 1974 John petitioned for dissolution of the marriage. At that time John had worked for the Washington State Patrol for 22 years, and his pension rights in the State Patrol Retirement System constituted the most valuable marital asset. In the…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of FithianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Markham Advertising Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Stone v. StoneDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1978
  4. Waite v. WaiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Wilder v. WilderWashington Supreme Court · 1975

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of MoodyWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  2. In Re Marriage of MoodyWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Berry v. MeadowsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Farver v. Department of Retirement SystemsWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Barros v. BarrosCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API