Legal Opinion

Sturm v. Mau

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 1981No. 43588PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Caporale, District Judge.

Plaintiffs-appellants seek to establish, by prescriptive easement, a road in favor of the public across land owned by the defendants-appellees.

The trial court denied plaintiffs any relief and dismissed their petition. For the reasons set forth hereinafter, we reverse the judgment of the trial court.

In this equity action it is our duty to try the issues de novo upon the record and reach an independent conclusion without being influenced by the findings of the trial court, except, where the credible evidence is in conflict, to give weight to the fact that the trial…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Purdum v. ShermanNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Barnes v. MilliganNebraska Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Svoboda v. JohnsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Sullivan v. HoffmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Fischer v. Voldemars GrinsbergsNebraska Supreme Court · 1977

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Philip G. Johnson & Co. v. SalmenNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Concerned Citizens of Brunswick County Taxpayers Ass'n v. State Ex Rel. RhodesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  3. F.H.T., Inc. v. FeuerhelmNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Johnson v. MaysNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  5. National Farmers Union Service Corp. v. EdwardsNebraska Supreme Court · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API