Legal Opinion

People v. Rueffer

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 10, 1939PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Bbien, J.

The information upon which defendant was tried and convicted alleges that, in transporting coal upon a truck, defendant failed to display upon the vehicle the name of the owner and the word “ coal.” These facts were proved and they constitute a violation of section 197-f of the Agriculture and Markets Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 69) which provides: “ All vehicles used in the transportation of coal or coke shall have conspicuously marked with permanent letters on the exterior of the right and left side thereof, in plain view and easily discernible, the name of the owner, together with the words coal…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. The Minnesota Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Kelly v. Washington Ex Rel. Foss Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Boston & Maine Railroad v. ArmburgSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. People Ex Rel. Frank v. McCannNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  5. Hudson River R. Dist. v. F., J. G.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dittman v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  2. Kuperschmid v. Globe Brief Case Corp.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1945
  3. People v. AdduciNew York City Magistrates' Court · 1941
  4. Dickerson v. New Jersey State Department of Weights & MeasuresDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1940
  5. People v. BunisNew York Supreme Court · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API