Legal Opinion
Boston & Maine Railroad v. Armburg
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided March 14, 1932No. 477PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone
This case is here on certiorari to review a judgment of the Muncipal Court of Boston, entered on rescript of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, holding that the Massachusetts Workmen’s Compensation Act does not impose an unconstitutional burden on interstate commerce. 276 Mass. 418; 177 N. E. 665.
The suit was brought by respondent to recover for personal injuries while in the employ of petitioner, an interstate rail carrier, engaged in both intrastate and interstate commerce. At the time of his injury, he was engaged exclusively in intrastate commerce. The Railroad Company…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- New York Central Railroad Company v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Pedersen v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Frost & Frost Trucking Co. v. Railroad Comm'n of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Shanks v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Mountain Timber Company v. State of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Huron Portland Cement Co. v. City of DetroitSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Head v. New Mexico Board of Examiners in OptometrySupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Metropolitan Casualty Ins. Co. v. BrownellSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- State v. ReedSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Tipton v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.