Legal Opinion

In re the Personal Restraint of Cruz

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 2006No. 77317-3PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1

J.M. Johnson, J.

Mr. Gilberto Cruz seeks relief from his judgment and sentence because, he argues, it is facially invalid. After a jury convicted Mr. Cruz of various drug offenses, the superior court sentenced Mr. Cruz to double the low end of the standard range sentence pursuant to its interpretation of RCW 69.50.408. That statute provides that any person convicted of a subsequent controlled substance offense may be imprisoned for “a term up to twice the term otherwise authorized.” RCW 69.50.408(1). Mr. Cruz argues that he was improperly sentenced because RCW 69-.50.408(1) doubles the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. JacobsWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Philippides v. BernardWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Philippides v. BernardWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. Silva-BaltazarWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  5. In re the Personal Restraint of HopkinsWashington Supreme Court · 1999

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Maytown Sand & Gravel, LLC v. Thurston CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Post v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Post v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. HacheneyWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. HacheneyWashington Supreme Court · 2007

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API