Legal Opinion · Dissent

Department of Transportation v. City of Atlanta

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 8, 1985No. 42499, 42673, 42674, 42675Published

1DissentWeltner, Justice

I dissent to those portions of the majority opinion which affirm the trial court.

1. OCGA § 32-3-1 (a) provides: “Any property may be acquired in fee simple or in any lesser interest, including scenic easements, airspace, and rights of access, by a state agency . . . through . . . eminent domain ... for present or future public road or other transportation purposes.” (Emphasis supplied.)

2. In 1955, we held that what was then known as the State Highway Department “has paramount authority in the matter of taking any property within its boundaries for those public uses to which it may reasonably…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Earth Management, Inc. v. Heard CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
  2. Elberton Southern Railway Co. v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955
  3. Smith, Barry & Co. v. Davis Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1890
  4. Southern Railway Co. v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API