Legal Opinion

Elberton Southern Railway Co. v. State Highway Department

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 13, 1955No. 19007PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hawkins, Justice.

1. While the State Highway Department can exercise no power except that granted (Irwin v. Crawford, 210 Ga. 222, 78 S. E. 2d 609; Georgia Power Co. v. Georgia Public Service Commission, 211 Ga. 223 (2), 85 S. E. 2d 14), by Code (Ann. Supp.) i 95-1504 it is provided that the Highway Department is “To have charge and control of all road or highway work designated or provided for, or done by the State or upon the State-aid roads.” By Code § 95-1705 it is empowered to designate or locate all Slate-aid roads, and by Code (Ann. Supp.) § 95-1728, to designate and take charge of any…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Kohl v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. SHERLOCK v. Alling, AdmInistratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Brown v. HoustonSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  4. United States v. Gettysburg Electric Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
  5. Georgia v. City of ChattanoogaSupreme Court of the United States · 1924

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Department of Transportation v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
  2. City of Atlanta v. Airways Parking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1969
  3. Louisiana Power and Light Co. v. City of HoumaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. Richbow v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  5. Riley v. South Carolina State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API