Legal Opinion

Smith, Barry & Co. v. Davis Bros.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 5, 1890PublishedCited by 15 opinions

New trial. Practice. Statutes. Construction. Before Judge Marshall J. Clarke. Fulton superior court. September term, 1889. Deported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Bleckley, Chief Justice.

A case between these parties was pending in the superior court when the act of November 12, 1889, was approved and went into effect. It was tried on the next day, and a verdict was rendered for the plaintiffs. The defendants made a motion for a new trial, but did not file a brief of the evidence within 30 days after the trial. The session of the court continued for more than 30 days, and during the same term, the court, at the instance of the plaintiffs, dismissed the motion because a brief of the evidence had not been filed within 30 days after the trial, resting the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Powell v. Augusta & Summerville RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
  2. Western & Atlantic Railroad v. MeigsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1885

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Undercofler v. Colonial Pipeline Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  2. Butterworth v. ButterworthSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
  3. State Revenue Commission v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  4. Fulton-DeKalb Hospital Authority v. GaitherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
  5. Orr v. RileySupreme Court of Georgia · 1925

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API